The Court finds that defendants in this passionately charged national issue have the more persuasive argument.And then emphasizes:
For the reasons that follow plaintfiss motion for summary judgement is DENIED and defendants’ motion for summary judgement is GRANTED.Further into the ruling, Judge Feldman expresses concern in other states’ marriage bans. He writes:
Perhaps, in the wake of today’s blurry notion of evolving understanding, the result is ordained. Perhaps in a new established point of view, marriage will be reduced to contract law, and, by contract, anyone will be able to claim marriage.Further more, Judge Feldman reveals who anyone would be:
Oh no, it doesn’t stop there:
… Must the states permit or recognize marriage between an aunt and niece?
Aunt and newphew? Brother/brother? Father and child? May minors marry? Must marriage be limited to only two people?And while we’re still going at it:
What about a transgender spouse? Is such a union same-gender or male-female? All such unions would undeniably be equally committed to love and caring for one another, just like the plaintiffs.Way to be on the wrong side of history, Louisiana; we can't say we're really surprised. To gain access to this ruling’s document, you may visit here: Louisiana Marriage Case.
Keep Up With PopWrapped On The Web!Twitter SoundCloud Facebook Instagram Tumblr Pinterest YouTube